Reader Response WILD
In the
reader’s responses on Goodreads, I found so much negative feedback on the
thoughts of Cheryl Strayed’s, Wild. I think Cheryl’s lack of preparedness,
along with self-destructive life choices, makes for a bad reputation. The way
Cheryl reflects her past in writing, can give the audience a lack of empathy,
assuming Strayed is looking for pity.
Such as, Nikiverse stating, “Wahhh, I did heroin and cheated
on my husband and my life's a mess. Wahhh I'm too tired to even masturbate.
Wah! I slept without protection and got an abortion! I lost my toenailz. I have
godzilla skin on my hips because my backpack weighs so much!”
I
disagree with those thoughts on Strayed’s story. When I read the book, I felt a
connection with a woman struggling from loss, suffering grief, and attempting a
sense of self-fulfillment. I think those are attributes to a story of physical
and psychological self-care, like Megan C. Brown suggested in her thoughts of a
new sub-genre, “self-help”. These specific features in Strayed’s book, gave me
a different understanding of independence, and self-reliance. The metaphors and
lessons give me a different perspective on such a diverse way to cope, and grow
as a woman, with struggles that so many others can relate to.
Do you think those negative reviews reflect more on the writers than on Strayed?
ReplyDelete